Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Hearst Playground story in Current"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here is the email, it was sent on November 28th at 11:45: [i]Dear Neighbors: If you haven’t already, please fill out the survey. I must confess, I was put off (and very angry) by the fact that it requires you to pick a pool and pool option even if you chose the no pool option – in fact, I haven’t filled out my own survey yet. But see the note we received back after our complaints about the survey, and make sure you and yours fill it out despite the problems. [b](Each device is allowed one response.)[/b] Please, read further down the fantastic letter put out by the Cleveland Park Historical Society. Also, Harry Martin raised our concerns at the Community Meeting with Mayor Bowser two weeks ago, and she promised to meet with us (stayed tuned for scheduling details.) And Hans Miller scheduled a meeting for us with newly-elected ANC 3C Commissioner Emma Hersh on Sunday, Dec. 11 at 2 PM at Hearst Park. (Please meet near the Idaho Avenue entrance to Hearst.) Finally, while I haven’t seen it, the NW Current ran an article Nov. 23 entitled “Park Service nixes alternative site,” which is about our proposed alternative site at Glover Archbold. Recall that we proposed multiple alternative sites and are in the process of reaching out to the National Park Service to follow up. So we keep on keeping on and can’t imagine a better group of people to be associated with - and for that I am very thankful. [/i] So please don't cast dispersion on your neighbors who were playing by the rules when the opponents are the ones who were stacking the votes. Yes, the anti's ARE the Trumpkins here. Own it.[/quote] Sorry, while I do see the statement that each device is allowed one response, I don't see an explicit effort to "stack the votes" and "game the results" However, this is exactly what a pool supporter urged on DCUM: [quote]If you haven’t already, please fill out the survey (Each device is allowed one response) so if you want the pool, do what those opposed are doing and [b]be sure to us multiple devices to game the results.[/b] https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/QHZJJ7K[/quote] [/quote] Then you are being willfully obtuse, just like the Trumpkins. Like I said, own it. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics