Reply to Government Shutdown - September, 2025 Editiion

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Government Shutdown - September, 2025 Editiion"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]My unpopular opinion..

As a Dem I think their shutdown strategy of holding the line on premiums is a losing one.

Like it or not, the GOO has the upper hand with Trump at the helm.  Sooner or later, the govt needs to reopen. The shut down creates a distraction for Trump and proj 2025 to leverage opportunities. A lot can happen in the shutdown with him as Pres, legally or not.

The better strategy is to use the leverage of anger when GOP increases costs to bring more folks to the Dem side.  If you are a Dem, you support what they are doing but those independents and GOP folks are who you want to convince. The way to do that is not to inflict more pain and ultimately lose this fight but to jet the pain happen and say - hey vote for us instead!

The only thing happening now is pain for all.  This is nothing but a damn show out in by the Dems to court public favor- to say hey - aren't we cool?! They are not. I put money on the fact that the only people who will be backing down to reopen the govt will be Dems as GOP are clearly anti gov.  This is exactly what they want.  As long as the right people get paid - those in their side - they win.

This whole mess is the Dem debacle and I'm a Dem.  This is just not the right fight to have.  Not at all.  They will end up in a weaker position than the start because they won't have gained anything.

This is how Trump win the Presidency - they built a org, a momentum, a team, a cause.  It's what the Dems should be doing.  What's going on now is the people working separately from political leadership and that's what the Dems need to fix. 
[/quote]

I agree somewhat. The Dems are in a losing position like the GOP was during the Obama administration when the ACA passed. The GOP offered no better ideas and the Dems came out looking good. Now the shoe is on the other BUT the Dems could drop the rope in this tug of war and let the GOP land on its keester. Instead, hardline partisan politics on both sides will hurt the electorate by holding up the budget. SMH[/quote]
While the GOP got the blame for the 2013 shutdown, they did quite well in the 2014 midterms. I suppose today's Dems are looking toward a similar outcome.[/quote]

I think continuing to dig in will backfire on the Dems. They will be seen more like MAGA / GOP on this one. Bity will be seen as focusing too much on the feud between them and forgetting they are supposed to working for the American people. [/quote]

The Democrats have been very clear that this is about healthcare access and the ACA subsidies. People are finding out now (see the article on Idaho below) and through the next couple of weeks why this matters.

This is exactly the right time for them to hold fast, both morally and politically.

[b]Idaho kicks off Affordable Care Act open enrollment as premiums are set to rise nationwide[/b]
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/idaho-kicks-affordable-care-act-open-enrollment-premiums-are-set-rise-rcna237298

[quote]Many Idahoans will have to decide whether they’ll be able to afford coverage once the enhanced subsidies that kept premiums lower for many middle-class families expire at the end of the year.

Bob McMichael, 63, and his wife, Leslie, 62, already know they won’t.

Both are retired and make about $42,000 a year. They currently pay $51 a month for their ACA plan. Late last month, they got a notice that their monthly premium would increase to $2,232 next year without the subsidies.[/quote]

[quote]Gideon Lukens, a senior fellow and director of research and data analysis on the health policy team at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a nonpartisan research group, said that a 60-year-old couple earning $85,000 a year in Idaho could see about a $1,500 increase in their monthly out-of-pocket premiums.[/quote][/quote]

As a reminder, THIS is what it's about ⬆️

It's NOT about "free shit for illegals."  Never was.  That's been a GOP lie from the start, as illegals are SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED.

Nor is it "an additonal $1.5 trillion in spending for Democrat programs."  It's not "new" - it's an extension of existing programs, nor is it for "Democrats."

And it's not just some leftist hyperbole.  It's real and it's already starting to hit - in red states like Idaho.

[img]https://i.redd.it/fs4jlx982nvf1.jpeg[/img]

Snap out of it, Republicans.  You are being lied to.  That's now a proven fact, just look at Idaho.[/quote]

So as the Tweet says, for this particular person/plan, the cost is going from $51 to $2,232.

That's a $2,181 increase in cost.  WHO subsidized that $2,181 previously?

Answer:  [b]It was coming out of the income tax payer's hide.[/b][/quote]

Now those taxpayers are funding tax cuts for billionaires.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics