Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The posters who think discovery has no reasonable limits are the same folks pushing Blake’s request for a gag order a few weeks ago and who also think she is going to add Freedman as a party. None of these things happened or are going to happen in the real world[/quote] No one has argued that discovery has no legal limits, only that discovery is generally more expansive than what would be admissible at trial. And yes this sort of thing does happen "in the real world." Are you under the impression that sensational legal fictions often hinge on the discovery motions? They don't. People who get their understanding of the law from TV and movies don't even know what discovery is much less how a motion to compel evidence from a third-party witness would work.[/quote] I’ e been a litigator for two decades, and not sure what the hell you are talking about,[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
