Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Bad Art Friend"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I wondered what was up when Brennan published her two long pieces and kidneygate didn’t publicize them as he has most other big news in the story — thought it was unlikely kidneygate missed it. Aaaagh!!![/quote] Yes, it was obvious that Brennan was talking about kidneygate with her first vague post. I wish Brennan would just say, I sourced some of this from kidneygate who did a great job assembling this initially, and I accidentally used the screenshots from there. It isn't a big deal to thank someone else. Nobody doubts that Brennan did a lot of work or that Brennan is going through a hard time. [/quote] I honestly think I’m this case the explanation might be that she did not source them from Kidneygate. These screenshots are floating around a bunch of places online, and she may have gotten them from elsewhere. If you see a screenshot of a public document 6 places, who do you credit? That’s why I think kidneygate is being ridiculous. I really don’t think you can assume Brennan read that account or got the screen shots there. She could have grabbed them from another tweet that failed to say where she got them from. A friend might have screen grabbed them and texted them. She may have found them on Reddit. She clearly read through the court docs herself (and was working from a hospital) and I think screengrabbed most of those shots, if not all of them, herself. For kidneygate to argue Brennan relied on his account is silly, and I say that as someone who follows kindneygate and read the Brennan posts. She put more effort, synthesized more details, and was more thorough than anything kidneygate has done. If anything, this incident is clarifying as to why what Larson did was much worse and why Dawn’s restraint in response laudable. Larson stole Dawn’s words from a private work and sought to profit off of them. Brennan maybe used an unaccredited screenshot if a public document that has been widely circulated, and which she also identified in the source. Extremely different situation![/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics