Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Funding for Shepherd's Renovation"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So Lafayette, Ellington, and Murch are going to be stopped after phase 1 with no finish date, right?[/quote] I don't know enough about those three projects to comment with lots of detail. Given that Murch is pretty high on the ranking list, and has never had any renovation, I'd imagine it will get an actual renovation despite the budget hit it took. Ellington had always struck me as a CF - it seems to live on political pull. I'd be happy to hear about its budget getting slashed, but won't hold my breath. I'm betting Lafayette has a single phase renovation plan in place, and it's pretty high on the priority list anyway. IIRC, the Education Committee says it's trying to move away from multi-phase renovation plans in general. I'm sure it's frustrating for Shepherd families, but it's hard to have much sympathy when you've already gotten 19 million for renovations and the school is rated as good condition. Seems to me that Grosso's effort to allocate renovation money according to actual need makes a lot more sense.[/quote] NP here. The point is that they didn't make mutli-phased renovations for those projects-- they are doing it all in one go. So, after a year or two (or 3+ for DE) of renovations, those projects are 100% done. It's not like there was less work involved- there was far more. Why does the last 1/3 of Shepard's project get written off just because they planned in 3 phases instead of 1?[/quote] Right so imagine Murch gets its budget stopped after 6 months of construction because it's new, current condition makes it now lower on the priority list. If Murch (or any school going forward for that matter) gets assessed based on their country diction prior to any construction, shouldn't Shepherd? Why penalize then for their construction that started? Why is this so hard to get or make equivalent to upcoming schools? Murch would be outraged (rightfully so). Again, I'm not a Shepherd parent but I don't get it.[/quote] $10 says this WILL happen to Murch because it seems like their fate. One thing I will say is that because the students in these three examples are all displaced-- at great cost-- it would be a lot harder to put the projects on hold. Shepard students are already in the building, so there's no $$ pain in lopping off the end of their project.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics