Reply to Will the PCSB move to force LAMB to back-fill after PK4?

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "Will the PCSB move to force LAMB to back-fill after PK4?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just approved! We are in the high 30s on the pk3 waitlist so we are pretty pleased[/quote]

They also agreed to start admitting in K for open spaces. [/quote]

I am a LAMB family and I have mixed emotions about this but it seems that our administration has determined they can make it work and I trust them.  I will say I don't really think this increases anyone's odds of getting in because they aren't increasing enrollment now that they are admitting in K (outside of the expansion), they will just spread the openings out across PK3-K, making fewer non-sibling openings available in PK3 and PK4.  The class sizes can't get any bigger, so if they decide to fill some of the open K slots, there will just be fewer PK3 and PK4 spots.  I suppose if they aren't at their current enrollment cap, they could add an additional new primary classroom to reach enrollment cap, but I have heard no discussion of this happening.  But maybe our administrators have some great idea to make this work out well for everyone!  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics