Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "Proposal is up!"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It sounds to me like they are also eliminating principal discretion to let people who got into a school in boundary stay when they move out of boundary, unless they are high-risk. I think that's great and might relieve some of the overcrowding, to the extent that principals let students stay even when they move. I've heard this is a real problem at Oyster.[/quote] Huge problem at Oyster. Large number of kids that were IB in K and then moved far away. Also the new proposal looks good for Oyster-Adams. They keep Wilson and add Roosevelt Dual Language as a HS option. Of course they lose Deal but Adams is renovating in a few years anyway and will probably be a preferred option for most Oyster-Adams parents by then. In the end, they keep Wilson -- which is all that mattered. Cardozo would have been a disaster. Eaton loses Deal, which is a bummer. But Deal is overcrowded so this pretty much had to happen. Hardy might improve even more as a result of all this. Hardy draws from a lot of good areas, no reason why it shouldn't be as good as Deal.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics