Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Rolex"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Rolex is for amateurs. The really rich are buying Richard Mills timepieces.[/quote] agree, rolex are kind of tacky, they are very shiny. and they aren't for accuracy- quartz watches all keep better time- its a hobby. I dont think they signal any sort of refinement though, vintage patek or any other watch you get from your grandparents from before the 1940s is an actual flex. [/quote] While I appreciate a vintage Patek as a watch enthusiast, a grandfather’s Patek on the average male’s wrist looks like a women’s watch. That’s not a flex. It’s more of an oddity to a lay person. Rolex Submariners, both with a date and without, are not shiny at all. Both their cases and bracelets are brushed steel. I’ve had quartz watches that cost thousands of dollars that kept amazing time, and were also shiny. I liked them very much, but quartz just isn’t the same.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
