Reply to Taylor's Feb. Rec for Woodward Boundary Study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Taylor's Feb. Rec for Woodward Boundary Study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The issue is the demographics of the new WJ. Do the math.

It’s another Whitman (less diverse and richer than current WJ) while Woodward is just a mile away and will be a very different school.[/quote]What do you mean by different?[/quote]

Wealth. A lot less of it.[/quote]

Don’t turn on the new Woodward families when MCPS divided the schools and even the WJ cluster in an unexpected way. The way they split KP and GP puts all the single family homes in WJ rather than Woodward. [/quote]

Is there a more close up map to show where gp and kp split?[/quote]

GPES has many multi family houses still going to WJ. The Parkside condos, stoneybrook, apts near Grosvenor.

The islands from GPES that didn’t get WJ make complete sense. They should go to Woodward. One is directly next to Woodward.

Option B was the right call.

They will do elementary boundary soon to mitigate some of the split articulation issues. KPES is under capacity and Ashburton is over capacity. It will get resolved.

Looks like all the Option B signs on Strathmore worked.[/quote]

But you agree that all the single family homes from GP and KP are going to WJ (granted that includes some mutifamily units going to WJ).

I think it’s just an interesting point. I thought GP, Farmland and Luxmanor were trying to stay together - that was the goal.  But not how it played out. [/quote]

Goal was to just get into WJ.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics