Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Third round options on Woodward Boundary study"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am confused about Option F -- it actually splits kids from Sligo Creek Elementary between Eastern and TPES (not Eastern and Sligo, as originally announced). Wondering again what this would mean for kids in immersion. [/quote] They said they’d divide Ssims between the two schools. I think close in SCES is closer to TPMS, so this is a geographically sensible pivot maybe responding to criticism that eastern and Sligo are becoming too large. I assume the immersion program would continue to Eastern, but could be wrong. This could also have implications for rezoning that part of the SCES boundary as well. Close in SCES could be moved to ESS and the neighborhood would articulate to TPMS and Northwood together. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
