Reply to James Comey Indictment

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "James Comey Indictment"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Nine years into erosion of our democracy and I still am shocked at how many people out there are willing to do the bidding of a wannabe dictator. It’s really unbelievable. I realize they had to get some random insurance attorney to file this, but she actually said sure why not! 
[/quote]

But a grand jury indicted. I know the litmus test isn’t as stringent as a verdict, but still.[/quote]

A grand jury is a majority vote. 
A conviction jury is unanimous. 
A grand jury has no defense, and the prosecution can lie.
A conviction jury hears a defense.

This is a political farce. The "litmus test" is that DOJ was able to assemble a MAGA majority for the grand jury. [/quote]
Grand jury indictments are designed to threaten and frighten people into gambling with their freedom and ultimately into taking a plea, regardless of the individual’s innocence. Prosecutors stack charges and ask at least 23 people to believe their uncontested double hearsay evidence and issue an indictment. The prosecutors then take an indictment of four charges and tell the accused to plead guilty to two of the charges or spend thousands in legal fees and an ultimate penalty of decades/life of imprisonment. Yeah, what do you think many people do with those odds. Many innocent people succumb due to the overwhelmed odds of the weight of the prosecutor’s office. And it doesn’t help that prosecutors have enormous resources and absolutely nothing to lose if they withhold exculpatory evidence. [/quote]

Unless you are Epstein.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics