Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "Jury refuses to indict Sandwich Man and other Trump cop misadventures"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^dude nobody is making an actual legal argument. We are too far gone for that. what we are saying is you MAGAs are complete and utter hypocrites. [/quote] Why do you think it is okay to assault cops now. You wanted everyone who even walked on the Capitol Lawn on January 6 in prison. Meanwhile your buddies set fires in Lafayette Park and that was ok because antifa people enjoy playing with matches[/quote] He didn’t assault anyone. He threw a sandwich and was provoked. Kind of different from gathering en masse to forcibly overturn an election and break into a government building and trash it. [/quote] So you just want to litigate January 6? If you are going to keep comparing this guy to January 6 please post an actual vidéo of à DOJ employee striking a police officer on January 6. And I mean not just theories and speculation but an actual video of a current, named, specific employee assaulting someone and please identify said employee in the video.[/quote] Yes, I want to “litigate” Jan 6. Well it was already litigated but Trump decided to reverse the results. [/quote] You are claiming that DOJ has employees who assaulting cops on January 6.I am asking you to provide proof to support your claim with a video and the name of the person.[/quote] That’s easy those court cases are online . There were at least two DOJ employees [/quote] OK just so you know you will have to do a better job of getting the evidence if you want to challenge your termination. It is not enough to say random people committed assault on January 6, thus giving me permission for an assault. The reason that is not OK is you are ignoring the rules of the place that pays you. When you violate your employers policies, it is grounds for termination.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics