Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Should influencers be allowed to sue to block public records requests?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm assuming the judges are deciding these cases on an individual level according to the facts. So, I'll trust them to make the decisions.[/quote] I would like the judge to say to her, “oh, so you think there is too much public interest in the death of your child? Maybe you should have thought about that before selling your family for profit.”[/quote] Does the public really need to see video footage of the child drowning??? No, they don't. [/quote] She is trying to block the death certificate, the 911 call, and the police report. All things that are routinely released in court proceedings, etc. At any point in her life prior to this happening, she would have viewed this much interest in her as a reflection of her awesomeness and her being a “girl boss.” If my child died, the public would not care because I don’t put my life out there on sale for the world. She does. But yes, you are right I absolutely loathe influencers and struggle to find any empathy when things go poorly for them. My first thought was that she was probably filming/editing/prepping while her unattended three year old wandered outside. [/quote] I just read the first few pages of the linked court document, but it seems like what’s really happening is that as a mom, she doesn’t want to see the video or read any graphic details and is afraid that she will end up unwittingly viewing them, whether it’s because they will be splashed across the tabloid pages, or because people maliciously send them to her inboxes. I don’t think it’s inherently unfair for her to try asking for this, especially when it’s within her right to do so. In terms of moral or karmic balance… she has LOST HER CHILD. And her livelihood as she knows it. If she would like to try to use the legal system to obtain a little privacy during this time because a large number of people like the unhinged PPs don’t consider it within the bounds of decency to offer it, well, that doesn’t offend any sense of rightness for me. But I also have no idea who this woman is, and am not on social media at all because I’m not interested. So maybe that’s why I’m not so angry bc literally this has no impact on me. Anyway not to worry guys, cases like these will be used as corporate justification for more and more totally faked AI content in the very near future….it’ll look just like this woman’s channel, but be completely computer-generated, no real family to protect, ta da! And we’ll keep hurtling faster towards hell while you all are obliviously nitpicking at these sad fellow humans on the fringes.[/quote] +1[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics