Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Amherst v Pomona"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I dont think any of the top half dozen slacs are struggling. slacs a full rung down (ranked 15+) - yes, agree.[/quote] Top SLACs are doing great, to be sure, but they have still declined in relative prestige vis a vis top national universities over the last generation, in case you are unaware of that trend. Pomona is more insulated from this.[/quote] People who prefer LACs will always prefer LACs. There is no change in "prestige."[/quote] Numbers don’t lie. And facts are stubborn things.[/quote] What numbers?? What are the “facts” around the “prestige” of LACs 🙄[/quote] Applicant trends away from SLACs, towards urban areas, and towards national unis. Perhaps you missed the memo.[/quote] Perhaps you haven't noticed the acceptance rates or the 1500 average SAT scores from the top dozen SLACs?[/quote] Test optional.[/quote] Relative to National Unis? Not so much. You probably want to actual educate yourself before putting fingers to keyboard.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics