Reply to TJ entrance test answers were never for sale

Forum Index » Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)

Reply to "TJ entrance test answers were never for sale"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Affluent families who could afford test prep programs were buying their kids an unfair advantage in admissions.

In fact, back in 2017 the SB switched to quant-q, which intentionally didn’t share prep, in an effort to reduce this unfair advantage.

https://www.washingtonian.com/2017/04/26/is-the-no-1-high-school-in-america-thomas-jefferson-fairfax-discrimination/
[i]“ “[u]Is it gonna once again advantage those kids whose parents can pay to sign them up for special prep camps[/u] to now be prepping for science testing as well?” Megan McLaughlin [FCPS School Board] asked when presented with the new plan.

Admissions director Jeremy Shughart doesn’t think so. The firm that markets the math portion of the test, [u]Quant-Q, doesn’t release materials to the public, a practice that should make them harder for test-prep schools to crack[/u].”[/i]

TJ students and others have publicly acknowledged the unfair advantage that money can buy and that test prep companies have a "cache of previous and example prompts".

https://www.tjtoday.org/23143/showcase/the-children-left-behind/
[i]“ Families with more money can afford to give children that extra edge by signing them up for whatever prep classes they can find. They can pay money to tutoring organizations to teach their children test-taking skills, “skills learned outside of school,” and [u]to access a cache of previous and example prompts, as I witnessed when I took TJ prep[/u]; even if prompts become outdated by test changes, even access to old prompts enables private tutoring pupils to gain an upper edge over others: pupils become accustomed to the format of the writing sections and gain an approximate idea of what to expect.”[/i]

TJ students admitted that [u]they shared quant-q test questions with a test prep company or they saw nearly identical questions on the test. [/u]
https://www.facebook.com/tjvents/posts/pfbid0jKy4hotXF8AxKwfHm2MAVi7e2yYoCqtrTTXPYsszAdQg6uMoTmReMidqyM1mpu9Bl

https://katedalby.com/get-tj-update/
[I]The math required for the test is basic math, algebra, and geometry.  In the past, we have used old SAT tests from 30 years ago augmented with select problems to mimic the Quant Q.  In order to adapt to the changes, we will increase the number of permutation and combination problems [u]in response to students’ observations about the math last fall[/u]. [/i]

https://www.optimaltjprep.com/
[i]““M. said that the  [u]math questions were very similar to the challenge problems[/u] she did with you in classes.” - C.R. (Mother, after 2018-19 test)
“E. said that the  [u]math questions were very close to what she did with you during the last 2 sessions.[/u] To quote her exactly: 'Dr, Tripathi's math problems were dead on point.'  We really appreciate your help with her preparation for the test!” - L.R. (Father, after 2017-18 test)”[/i]

Many videos showing [u]how to solve actual SIS math questions on TJ admissions tests[/u]: 
https://www.youtube.com/@katedalbysinspiringtestpre864/videos
https://www.youtube.com/@EduAvenuesTJTestPrep 
https://www.youtube.com/@principiatutorsconsultants4395/videos

[/quote]

If all this is true and your conclusions are correct, then why did we saw no increase in FARM students with the first administration of the quant Q test?

What did the quant Q test have as statistically insignificant impact on who got in relative to other years?

Nobody could prep or study for quant Q because nobody knew what was on the test.  So why didn't we see the sort of results you seem to think we would get if all the Asians weren't cheating?[/quote]

I was explaining the rationale behind the change to Quant-Q, not that it was successful. Any test prep is still better than no test prep.

Some good insights IMO: 
[i]"Almost every year since I applied to TJ, the Admissions Office has transformed its admissions process; though this purportedly prevents tutors from coaching students to a test, in actuality, this only makes it harder for disadvantaged groups to help themselves prepare for the exam.

The set of skills needed to excel at the exam is different from the one that’s typically taught in schools: [b]for those who haven’t been taking test prep for years, this may as well be the first time that they’ve taken a timed, standardized test. For those who’ve prepared for years, frequent practice exams and sample prompts allow them to gain experience taking 3 hour multiple choice exams like the Quant-Q/ACT-Aspire. [/b]As a senior who went through more than three years of TJ prep classes, the contrast between tuition-based courses and free outreach programs is saddening because tuition-based programs simply have more time and money: the competitive culture that fuels TJ prep encourages students to take classes from elementary school while parents’ money purchases the best prep books and hires the best teachers.

Given the additional [b]vague guidelines, little guidance, and a complete lack of prep material[/b], TJ Admissions and its applicant site denies ordinary people, those without access to expensive courses, the opportunity to get ahead. [b]The gap between applicant and finalist demographics continues to widen as fewer and fewer preparatory resources are made public for applicants[/b]." [/i]

https://www.tjtoday.org/23143/showcase/the-children-left-behind/

[/quote]

This is not data, this is the self flagellating of virtue signaling middle class kids bemoaning their privilege of being able to afford $2000/year program at places like curie.

Everyone took the quant Q cold that first year.  The bottom that multiple choice exams are some secret format is stupid.  Strategy and tactics on taking unspecified multiple choice exams is exceedingly thin and can be covered in an afternoon.

It's certainly not enough to explain the statistically similar results with quant Q vs the previous test by pointing at test prep.

Test prep is just dog whistle for "Asians are cheating". Which is just dog whistle for Asians are sneaky, conniving, greedy, immoral and unethical.  Pretty much the same stereotype that Jews faced when they were first a model minority.[/quote]

"Test prep" has never been limited to Asian families. And it's not just limited an afternoon of test taking strategies.

There is a robust test prep industry that caters to all flavors of wealthy people. Even today.

[/quote]

The Anti-Asian feeling" of the new admissions process was about asian families doing test prep and test prep is cheating so asian families are cheating.  [/quote]

You are pushing that narrative to stoke racial division for political purposes. Really disgusting.

They weren’t trying to get rid of Asian students. They added seats. They were trying to pull in more kids from across the county.

Having so much of the class coming from a handful of wealthy feeders wasn’t equitable.

[/quote]

I'm not the one that racially engineered the admissions process to reduce Asians and increase everyone else.

If you want to insist race had nothing to do with it, I can't stop you but nobody believes you.[/quote]

The goal wasn’t to reduce Asians. They ADDED seats to increase representation from various groups across the county, including kids from high FRE MSs, URMs, kids from ED families, kids with SNs, etc. 
[/quote]

How many seats did they actually add for students living in Fairfax County?  Yes, the total TJ enrollment increased by 60 or so seats, but the seats going to non-FCPS (especially PWC) kids have also greatly increased.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics