Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "The private sector is next "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Private sector been targeting for years, we gotta work for a living or get fired No one cares[/quote] Exactly. Companies like IBM, Xerox, Kodak, Westinghouse, US Steel, ATT, the auto companies , etc., etc. have laid off / cut the jobs of hundreds of thousands. The private sector had to change to survive. Job security is a relic of the past. Now it’s the Federal Government’s turn. And it’s looooong overdue. And in the private sector you have to produce something that’s a foreign concept to Government people. That’s RESULTS. [/quote] JFC. No, the Federal Government civilian work force does NOT have to “produce” you mouth breathing goon. I realize that you refuse to let this concept penetrate your thick skull, but the a Government (as a proxy for the country) is NOT. A. BUSINESS. If your local fire department had a slow year (because there weren’t any fires) and couldn’t therefore show that they had put out X number of fires, would you declare them useless and lay them off? They clearly weren’t producing anything, or even putting out fires which is their one job! You people are such morons it’s mind-boggling.[/quote] The limited mental acuity of yet another feeble-minded leftist ne'er-do-well on full display. The primary function of the U.S. government, as outlined in the Constitution's Preamble, is to "form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity" Although you're correct about the US Government not being a business, your overall assessment is clearly askew. The US Government is also not a charity. If you want [b]your[/b] money to fund things such as the promotion of atheism in Nepal... [twitter]https://x.com/saranstm/status/1771532045526716795[/twitter] feel free to send your donation(s). Should you desire [b]your[/b] money go towards ‘Reintegration’ Gift Bags for Deported Central Americans... [url]https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-19-62.pdf[/url] you're more than welcome to do so. Those are "proxies" that the majority of American taxpayers do [b]not[/b] wish to fund, nor are they the kind our government can afford. "the Federal Government civilian work force does NOT have to “produce” is beyond idiotic and completely devoid of common sense. Perhaps your understanding of the word "produce" is as limited as your intelligence. Here's a definition that would apply to ANY "work force" that can warrant its own existence - "cause (a particular result or situation) to happen or come into" Is that concept penetrating your thick, mouth-breathing skull yet? If nothing else, American citizens invest in the Federal Government based on the tax revenue collected by said government. Good investments "produce" positive returns/results. And then there's your moronic comparison to a local fire department...which isn't even worthy of any further response.[/quote] Ok, so Congress can say no more. It’s not some unelected South African headcase’s call. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics