Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Do you think DOGE will eliminate remote policy?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Per that NYT article on DOGE, Joni Ernst who is working with them is thinking that to save money the government should just allow WFH and to end the government leases. This actually sounds like something that would save the government money while retaining efficiency.[/quote] It would save a ton of money. I assume you'd lose locality pay, and if so a lot of us might quit because we are locked into the DC area. But a lot more of us might either live with the cut or move somewhere cheaper. You'd still have certain jobs that require in-person presence, so some building expenses would persist. The trickier part would be what to do with people who must be in person but only sometimes (like to go to the Hill) - do you pay for their travel, or do you require them to be within x miles and pay locality?[/quote] I don't really know how locality pay works for full-remote people. Is it based on the location of their home? [/quote] As a fully remote worker - I can confirm I am paid based on my home address. So I don't get DC locality. The irony is if they make me move to DC they will be paying me more.... [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics