Reply to Tulsi Gabbard - Director of National Intelligence

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Tulsi Gabbard - Director of National Intelligence"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Democrats are freaking out because they're finally putting someone in charge of national security that isn't a psychopath.[/quote]
Why do you think she’s the best candidate for the job. Not asking why you think she’s minimally qualified. Asking why, of all the options Trump has, she’s the best choice.[/quote]
Before criticizing Trumps picks you need to defend Biden picks.

What was Blinken’s qualifications? The guy spent his career as a Biden staffer.

Or how about Jake Sullivan? Campaign aid to Obama and Clinton followed by sinecure at Yale.

Democratic partisans are fascinating in their inability for self reflection before accusation. [/quote]
Not sure why you’re bringing up other people. This thread is about Tulsi Gabbard. I’d like to know why you think she’s the best person for the job. Can you answer?[/quote]
Checking back. Still waiting to hear why Tulsi is the best candidate for this job.[/quote]

It's kind of a dumb question.

Demonstrated willingness to put her life on the line to serve her country.
Demonstrated ability to stand up for her principles.
Long-standing unwillingness to throw away American lives for no good reason.
Demonstrated willingness to seek solutions to significant issues impacting national integrity.
General lack of the psychopathy that is so endemic to the typical picks for this sort of position.

It was an obvious choice.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics