Reply to Was UM, UVA, and UW Madison considered more “prestigious” back in the day?

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Was UM, UVA, and UW Madison considered more “prestigious” back in the day?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]UVA is unique among publics for the combination of its founders, its architecture, its age, its quality education, including its professional schools, and its strong connections with Ivies. [/quote]
[b]
UVA is actually not as old as Michigan[/b].  It was founded 183 years after Harvard.  I know of no real connection with Ivies.  It is not in the Ivy League.  I also don't think UVA is ranked particularly high in areas like quality of undergraduate teaching.
[/quote]

Come on, get real.  Michigan was founded in1817,  UVA in 1819.[/quote]

That’s a myth. Michigan was founded in 1841, that was the first day of classes. The 1817 myth was made up in the 1910s when Wisconsin was more prestigious; Michigan felt they had to identify with the “Cathelopistimiad”, a high school founded in Detroit in 1817. It closed in 1827.

Old seals of Michigan often show the date “1837”, marking the university’s establishment in Ann Arbor, but the first day of classes did not begin until the appointment of the first professor, Asa Gray, in 1841.

See, even in the 1910s Michigan students were insecure….[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics