Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Fascinating article from the WSJ re the methods of an "elite" college counseling firm "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Crimson prefers public school students over private. Also, they prefer to work with international students.[/quote] Yes, because it's well known now that your chances of elite college admissions are better in an uncompetitive environment. It's easier to stand out in the school, grading is easier, etc. [/quote]Waterford! Many.public schools have competitive environments, but they have fewer networked students. That is more likely what he is trying to avoid. I think the telling part of the article is the way he sees these schools as if they are trying to reject as many students as possible and only interested in status. That is not our experience (we are public school family with 2 at Ivies and no coach). He makes it adversarial to justify all these hiding. And then he uses that branding to fuel his business. [/quote] Same poster. Not sure where that Waterford came from. Some kind of bizarre autocorrect I guess. Sorry for the weirdness [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics