Reply to Do women expect a ring at 1 year?

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "Do women expect a ring at 1 year?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If you just want to be DINKs then who cares.  Also at your age, she might be best you'll ever be able to do.  Let's say she hits 30 and all her friends start hitting their major life milestones and you're still not ready, but she is, and dumps you.  You're now back in the dating pool with a different, older crowd of women.[/quote]

OP here. Most older men always find younger women. They almost always pass up the older women for younger. Not saying it’s right but I think men my age still go for 23-30 year old women. [/quote]

My point is that they are less likely to go for you as you age.[/quote]

OP here. I don’t agree with that. Many men my age still date younger women and I think they can always get that. It’s women over 35 that have a harder time of ever finding a partner because men my age won’t date them. [/quote]

OP, you’re gross and have cultish ideas about things. It took some prodding with these comments, but you’ve surely revealed yourself. [/quote]

OP here. I’m merely speaking facts. Most women over 35+ have a much harder time finding a partner than a man 35+. Most men will date younger women instead of a woman their age. Don’t be upset because you can’t accept reality. [/quote]

They’re not facts unless you can show me a peer reviewed studies. Otherwise your statement is just some anecdotal experiences you and your Peter Pan Cath-bros are spouting as truth. [/quote]

OP here. You don’t live in real world. [/quote]

I bet you’re such a nerd IRL. Otherwise you’d already have bagged a wonderful woman. They just didn’t want anything to do you. [/quote]

OP here. What’s wrong with being a nerd?

Most men have a financial clock, just like women have a biological clock.

A man isn’t a man unless he provides for his family. I stand by that belief. I don’t believe a man 30+ should get married unless he’s financially well. Being able to provide for your wife and kids is important.

[/quote]

There are many, many good men out there that are not financially well. This doesn’t make them less of a man by any stretch of the imagination. It’s their character and how they treat others that makes them a man, not whether they can provide their hot sexy 10 girlfriend a house in Bethesda.

For your age, you haven’t grown up much from your fairy tale idea of what adulthood should look like. You should work on your character, sexist tendencies, and general propensity for black and white thinking before you worry about whether the one year mark is too early to buy a ring. [/quote]

OP here. I never said men who made less weren’t suitable partners or good people. Two of my brothers work trades. My uncle and grandfather were mailmen. I value those jobs and would never look down on anyone for their job choice.

I still think men should provide. That doesn’t mean the woman doesn’t have to work or that he needs to be rich. Whether he makes $50k or $500k, men are ingrained to be providers.

I feel like I’m a good person. I’m also not sexist - don’t know where that came from.

I just know that I want more and want to give my future wife and kids the world. I want to be able to afford that big house in the suburbs, those private school tuitions, her dream wedding, her choice to stay home, work flexibility to be an involved parent, etc. You can do that on any budget, but my dream was always to be financially secure before marriage to afford a lifestyle my father gave to us.

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics