Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Kristen Stewart’s new newest look"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]She and Dakota Johnson are the same person. No personality. No appeal. No talent. They act like they are better looking than they actually are- so maybe that is their appeal- that they have self-confidence without reason?[/quote] Maybe you should ask yourself why you think that one only deserves self confidence if they happen to meet your definitions of goodness? Kristen Stewart has mad a lot of money off of her supposed lack of personality, appeal, and talent. She likely has a much more comfortable life than you and could not care less about what you think. I don't know much about her tbh and I haven't seen many of her movies (very few actually) but the audacity of feeling like you are entitled to walk up to another person and tell them they do not deserve to have confidence is really kind of shocking. [/quote] No what’s shocking is someone being upset over the criticism of an untalented, extremely LUCKY actress, who is clearly seeking publicity. She looks awful and can’t act. I wouldn’t say about a normal, PRIVATE person, but when you blast videos of yourself in an attempt to sway the public to go watch your crappy acting, all bets are off. If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen.[/quote] NP. Your little takedown? Was that supposed to be “the heat?” Aww. Bless your heart.[/quote] No, the “Heat” is people not seeing her movies. It’s already happening and is bound to get worse. She ruins every film she is part of with her bad acting. We’ve figured that out, so if a casting agent is going to disrespect us, the audience, by casting her, we won’t go to the film. Hollywood types don’t seem to get it. We’re sick of you casting your lame, untalented kids. We’re sick of them writing the scripts. Hire top people, not your friends’ children. Stop or cannibalise the industry completely. The audience are fine with you and your nepotistic crap.[/quote] Sure. That’s why her latest film gets an 85% positivity rate among viewers on Rotten Tomatoes. 93% among critics. But sure, no one likes her films. :roll: [/quote] First off, fewer people are seeing films than before and Hollywood is really struggling. Practically no one can get financing anymore. Secondly, people might like a film that has Kristen Stewart, but it’s despite of her. For god’s sake: SHE CANNOT ACT!!!!!!!! [/quote] Let’s turn to someone with more knowledge and credibility than you. From Manohla Dargis, one of the NYT film critics, on Stewart’s acting skills: “Watching Kristen Stewart is always an adventure. A performer who makes good movies better and dreary movies tolerable, she has a restlessness that has made her one of the more interesting attractions in American film. She has a gift for making a character’s inner life transparently readable, and while she can be subtle and withholding, it is her fascinatingly unquiet presence that draws you in, an itchy intensity that can keep her (and you) on edge. Pauline Kael wrote that Jane Fonda’s “motor runs a little fast” — so does Stewart’s.” [/quote] You’re joking, right? Speaking of struggling finances, no one is worse off than journalists and newspapers. They have no circulation anymore and tons of competition with bloggers, etc. They’re casualties of the internet, unable to compete with changing times. AI will only make it worse in terms of bogus reviews. Would I trust a critic in 1980? Sure, of course. But today, if you pay them a little, and I do mean, a little, they’ll publish anything you want them to say. Kristen Stewart cannot act. I don’t care how much (or rather how little) she or whoever is trying to promote her paid Manhola Dargis to say otherwise. She cannot act! [/quote] You seem like a person who is deeply unhappy with your life. I hope you find peace. In the meantime, Kristen will continue to roll around in her millions and Manohla will continue to have her words read by thousands. And there’s nothing you can do about it, not if you protest until you’re blue in the face and spittle flies from your mouth.[/quote] The NYT and its film critics especially are completely irrelevant these days. They aren’t rolling around in money. Their entire industry had fallen apart over the last thirty years. I agree a few THOUSANDS might read Manohla, but not the MILLIONS who used to read Ebert. There’s nothing Manohla can do about it. That’s why she writes whatever some producer tells her to write. As for KS, she got extremely lucky with Twilight, but her acting range is limited to sulking and looking constipated. Her career has stalled and she’s getting old. Meanwhile she’s gotten used to living the good life and wants to keep it up, but can’t. Like the whole movie industry, she is completely clueless about what the public wants. Finally, instead of coming up with an intelligent comeback, you’ve made completely irrelevant and plainly wrong assumptions about a total stranger. How the hell do you know what my financial or personal situation is? The only thing I’m sad or miserable about is how incredibly crappy films have gotten, how easily bought critics are and what bad performers make it to the big screen. I used to love going to the movies and now I hate to because of bad actresses like KS. The industry is murdering itself. It’s painful to watch.[/quote] You really need to work on your reading comprehension. It’s Kristen that I said was rolling around in her millions. And she is. Manohla Dargis has thousands and thousands of people read what she writes, yes. And you have about six on here. That seems right, given the quality of each author, respectively. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics