Reply to Princeton has 8 suicides in 3 years

Forum Index » College and University Discussion

Reply to "Princeton has 8 suicides in 3 years "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The grading on a curve is not “deflation”, it only seems harsh in comparison to the grade inflation at other ivies. It’s normal at many state schools that are ranked lower so it’s not simply an elitist or hierarchal issue. Princeton (and ivies in general) do not seem to attract many tougher, resourceful, and resilient students. [/quote]

Well you take everyone from the Top 5% in HS and put them at Princeton.  If the range of scores on an exam are 30-50% does that really mean the kids below 40% get a B- or lower?  I'd argue the professors should teach a bit better.  It is frustrating to study for a StEM class and take the exam and feel like you have no clue what you are doing and I say this as a T10 graduate with 2 majors in 5 years, it was 6.5 years worth of coursework, who graduated with a 3.9 and CS/Engineering was one of the majors.

So yes, if the range is 5-50, then the lower end did not learn the material, but 30-50 (and a mean of 38 lets say), tells me 38 should be a B and the 30 might be a C+/B-.  Similarly, ifprof teaches well, and the scores are 88-100%, then the lowest grade should be a B+/A-, not a C
The students learned the material, did well and it's Okay to give all A/A- in a course.  The purpose of courses is to learn the material, and if everyone does that well, then A's should be given.  Remember, you no longer have the "lower level" of kids that are at many HSs.  You just took the All A's/ All AP courses, advanced in math and science and LA/History kids and put them together.  They should logically all do well

[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics