Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Supreme Court Hearing on 14th Amendment and Trump"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Pretty clear threat by the SC Justices that Republican states are going to use this to disqualify Democrat candidates en masse, if the Court disqualifies Trump. [/quote] Why would this prevent a democrats who haven’t engaged in insurrection or are under felony indictments from being in the ballot? [/quote] Because the state could declare that a democrat did engage in insurrection even without a conviction.[/quote] Sure, and then they would sue and win or appeal and win. Because courts (didn't used to) tolerate nonsense. The Supreme Court typically doesn't make decisions based on hostage-taking. They generally aren't even aware that their decisions have wide-reaching effects in lower courts because they don't see those effects, it all gets sorted out below. [/quote] It's funny how these considerations that political actors might act in bad faith don't figure into other SCOTUS decisions on voting issues. They certainly didn't seem to care that politicians might abuse gerrymandering to their own partisan advantage when they were deciding whether partisan gerrymandering was constitutional. They didn't care that politicians who had historically discriminated against blacks in voting might start doing it again before they struck down the VRA's pre-clearance requirement. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics