Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Swimming and Diving
Reply to "Why doesn’t USA Swimming use cut-off dates like every other youth sport?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]^^ and this is why it’s easy to see who has a kid without a Feb/early March bday when they argue it’s equitable the way it is. I get that they need some kind of cut off but to say it’s fair is wrong. If it is so fair, then do it for summer swim and kids age up mid season. The same relay problem happens during club swimming when a kid ages up…so that’s the same problem year round. [/quote] The summer swim argument is a completely different issue. It’s like an 8 week season and a PITA to deal with aging kids up on their birthdays, although in theory I wouldn’t be opposed to it. Relays are a fun part of the big club meets but they mean nothing and often the kids swimming the relays are from all different sites of a club and may have never met each other before that day. In a true individual sport like club swim is, you can’t have a kid that turned 11 in January swimming 10 and under events in mid/late March. Your argument really boils down to wanting to disadvantage someone other than your February/March birthday kid. [/quote] Nope. It’s not about disadvantaging someone else. It’s about consistency and not disadvantaging anyone. Do you really think an 11 yr +2 months is very different from a 10 yr 11 months? The 10 year old with an April birthday is 10 yr+11 mos swimming against 9 yr+0 mos currently. Is that more fair?[/quote] Oh please, it absolutely is about disadvantaging someone else as long as that someone is not your kid. It’s an individual sport that is divided by age group categories, there is no reason to swim as anything other than your actual age. [/quote] Who is it disadvantaging? Please do tell. [/quote] Are you really that obtuse? You know damn well that allowing kids who turn 11 in January to race as 10 and unders in mid to late March disadvantages the spring birthday kids who would otherwise be in line to make finals, be on relays, etc. [/quote] Are YOU serious? You’re talking about kids who are 3 months apart in age. [/quote] You're literally arguing to change the cutoff because YOU don't like how it falls relative to your kid's birthday. You aren't saying that cutoffs aren't fair, but just that you don't like when this one falls. That's crazy. Your proposed cutoff is no more fair and is 100% more arbitrary than the current cutoff. --parent of a kid with an August birthday who is the youngest and disadvantaged on every single team except summer swim[/quote] New poster: August is one of the best birthdays. You get through: summer swim, long course champs, and zones. You then get most of aug, sept and at least part of Oct before your next meet. [/quote]Sure, it's good for swim. But not for soccer, basketball, lacrosse, field hockey and pretty much all other sports. Pretty much every rec sport and many select teams use grade-based cohorts.[/quote] Okay. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics