Reply to Texas judge grants woman’s request for abortion despite state ban

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Texas judge grants woman’s request for abortion despite state ban"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Let me get this straight. Leaking fluid, cramping, 2 prior C sections, all severe enough for a trained medical doctor to say that this  pregnancy is a threat to her health and future fertility. But the attorney general disagrees and gets another court to pause the permission that a Texas judge allowed this woman? Never mind that the fetus has a severe birth defect. Never mind that she had to go to court in the first place.

I’ve had 3 children with one pregnancy that was dangerous but it worked out OK. That experience has made me even more pro choice because I know first hand how difficult that is. It should not involve someone else’s medically uninformed opinion. [/quote]

Claims of fluid leaks are insufficient to justify an abortion because the fluid leaks were not amniotic fluid.

Cramping is uncomfortable but doesn’t justify an abortion.

2 prior c-sections do not justify an abortion.

Not a single doctor on earth could make any reasonable assessment of any woman’s future fertility.

[/quote]

Oh an anonymous poster in DCUM has weighed in in what medical decision this person should make. 
I guess that settles it.

Stay out of this woman's personal business.[/quote]

Everyone here is being anon docs and anon lawyers.

Stay out of Texas state law.[/quote]

Laws affect millions of citizens lives and most certainly every citizen and they should be knowledgeable and informed and engaged.   Personal medical decisions have nothing to do with you or any else.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics