Reply to Banning AR-15s

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Banning AR-15s"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m going to buy another just because of this hyperventilation. The first I have kitted ip over my fireplace in Fairfax. [/quote]

Great, unsecured and visible from a window. But at least you'll have the other one to mount over your commode. Then you'll be ready to chase down the guy who tries to snatch the first one if you don't trip over your own pants.[/quote]

Realistically, he's going to stay hidden in the bathroom. That's how these things typically go.[/quote]

Really? https://youtu.be/IFhkcgdkrY8?si=tmmAZH_9j50cF7s6[/quote]

NP, but not even watching whatever BS this is, every post about actual data, research, and solutions about reducing gun homicides is met with middle school level talk and deflection.

Republicans are NOT serious about focusing on the number one cause of death for children in America. Instead, it's about deflection re: Gender which (last I checked) doesn't show up as a leading statistical cause of death on any list. Deflection, deflection, deflection.

Stop and Frisk is the only supposedly serious solution offered, but the research on Stop and Frisk was not remotely definitive and many studies (when you don't cherry pick one to prove your point) found it didn't actually do anything, on top of the potential for constitutional infringement of rights (which 2a activists should take seriously or they are hypocrites).[/quote]

NYC says hi[/quote]

NYC implementation of Stop and Frisk was found to be unconstitutional and numerous studies did NOT find that it impacted crime. One did, others didn't. Do you not understand how research works?[/quote]

As liberals say, constitution is flexible. Studies said one thing, but Times Square was sure as hell safer, as were other areas[/quote]

Universal mandatory background checks, a persistent searchable database, et cetera are not unconstitutional.  Background checks have been upheld, restrictions on felons have been upheld, a database is not an infringement.  It can and should be done.[/quote]

Just curious, but what benefit do you see with a searchable database?  Searchable for what exactly? [/quote]

wont really matter in a few years with 3d printers. You can't stop weapons prolifiration. [/quote]

3D printing still takes significant gunsmithing skills to assemble a functional weapon - also, you can't 3D print some of the most critical parts - unless you don't mind having a gun that will likely blow up in your face for lacking the strength needed.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics