Reply to Grand Jury report on LCPS sexual assault cases is unsealed

Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS

Reply to "Grand Jury report on LCPS sexual assault cases is unsealed"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Still have no idea what Byard allegedly perjured himself about. Makes no sense to me. That man had no reason or benefit to lie intentionally. He wasn’t involved in any of the incidents, he’s simply a PIO. It’s so unfortunate how this entire situation has become so politically entrenched that you can’t tell what was legitimately handled poorly and what is simply part of a political operation because conservatives target Loudoun and found the perfect opportunity to exploit. And meanwhile nothing at all coming down on LCSO. [/quote]

The report claimed that the lawyer for the county intimidated everyone they represented. I believe it is just 1 lawyer who represented all the people on the LCPS side. It is not farfetched to believe that the PIO may have been intimidated into saying things by their legal representatives or even Ziegler himself. He has no reason to lie, but when you’re being spoken down to by your superiors, you may do things that you don’t really want to.

I remember reading a line in the report about Ziegler intimidating a subordinate administrator about something. The term “alpha-dogged” was used to by the subordinate to describe how Ziegler acted towards him. Don’t remember what the incident was about.

Then there was the incident of the 2 board members who was subpoenaed, and didn’t show up. When they were told they had 2 hours to arrive or be arrested, they immediately showed ups and stated that the lawyers told them to not show up.

All of this goes to show that even well educated people in high positions can do odd things that make no sense when they are being intimidated. Why did the PIO have to lie when he wasn’t even involved? Why did the 2 board members not show up even though they had nothing to do with the incidents? What are they afraid of? Did they really believe their lawyer’s words that they didn’t have to show up to court even if they got a subpoena? They think they can just ignore it and it will go away? They didn’t even google, “do I have to show up in court if I got a subpoena?” None of it makes any sense.

What do they have to hide? And why would a lawyer tells the clients to not show up to court when they been ordered to do so? What is the lawyer’s motive? To get the board members arrested??

Then there was a statement about the teachers who were also represented by the county lawyer. Apparently one teacher felt pressured into being represented by the county lawyer. She was not represented by him. But he claimed that he is representing her. She said he tried to shut her up and she was told not to cooperate. I’m surprised she could withstand that level of intimidation.

So it doesn’t surprise me at all if the PIO was told to say something that may be untrue even though it doesn’t benefit him at all. Because the goal could be not to benefit him but to benefit LCPS. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics