Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "What if George Zimmerman DID act in self defense?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]latest report is that police photos etc. show no blood or bruises on Zimmerman... if true, his nose gets longer the more he talks and the bullshit quotient expands exponentially.... In any case, causality analysis to me shows that he was explicitly told "do not pursue" and he did, so he is responsible for whatever happened after he ignored instructions and decided to go Rambo/vigilante.[/quote] Making shit up, where these photos you speakof, did you get an hd color version of the police video, prove your bullshit like the others who are able to post images and messages of wanna be gangsta drug dealer tray, or at no limmit n**** as he called himself.[/quote] Oh, now it has to be high def, because there might be microdroplets of blood on his shirt that are invisible to a regular camera??? OMG if Jesus came down from heaven and told you Zimmerman was guilty, you would accuse him of being a fake born in Kenya and demand to see his full birth certificate.[/quote] The point being is that you cant make out anything.g in the video due to the quality listen to Anderson Cooper go play by play and he even says it looks like the.police are examining injuries that are not picked up by the low quality of the video. Here are some more facts and evidence of all of at no limit n**** tweets, notice how i produce evidence and give youall data to avoid bias and hiding of facts Do all of your good kids who are 17 talk like this http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/26/the-daily-caller-obtains-trayvon-martins-tweets/ [img]http://cdn2.dailycaller.com/2012/03/pasc-tr1yv4n-r2tr1ct34n-2d3t2d-300x225.jpg[/img][/quote] You're pathetic. Do you actually think teens across America don't curse or talk sexual? Let me guess...you were a virgin until you got married? You're on DCUM, so I assume you are a parent. You should really be ashamed about what you posted. I doubt that you are, though. Just shameful. [/quote] New poster. I certainly don't think anybody deserves death due to anything they said or posted. I am not naive and certainly understand that kids not only talk about sex but have sex. However, some of these tweets go beyond "sexual" talk, they show signs of aggression ("fuck any bitch," "2 Glock 40s bitch you got 80 problems"). No, this is not typical teen talk. Since I haven't seen all of the evidence, I am refraining from speculating as to what happened. Obviously, it was tragic and Trayvon didn't need to, and shouldn't have, died. However, I can certainly imagine plausible scenarios where Trayvon became aggressive and GZ did feel like he was acting in self-defense. Is this what happened? I don't know. None of us know. [/quote] What is wrong with you? Despite some relatively minor problems, Trayvon has NO history of physical violence. NONE of his school suspensions were for violent acts, fights or anything else. NONE. He had no juvenile record either. He seems like the typical teenage boy with raging hormones, expressing himself online. If you think teens don't talk like this, you're incredibly naive. Tough talk does not mean you're going to do these things in real life. Get a clue. Zimmerman, on the other hand, has a past that primarily is about physical violence. Against a woman and a police officer. This guy seems to have anger management issues made worse because he knows Daddy will clean up his problems. Given this comparison, how the hell do you conclude that Trayvon is the violent one of the two? I'm convinced that Zimmerman was a guy who couldn't fight and he bit off more than he could chew when he engaged with Trayvon. Either out of frustration or hurt pride, he shot the boy. [/quote] What's wrong with you? You must have reading comprehension issues. I didn't say I thought Trayvon is the violent one of the two. I said that it is [i]plausible[/i] that he was the aggressor. It is [i]plausible[/i] (and possibly even probable) that Zimmerman was the aggressor. The fact is, we don't know what happened. And if my kids ever posted on twitter, FB, etc. about "hoes," "fucking any bitch," weed or guns, they will lose their access to these networks. Most teens I know keep their postings non-violent, use tamer (and less derogatory to woman) terms like "hooking up." [/quote] Only one person in this case has been in a court over violent acts, and it isn't Trayvon. That mugshot of Zimmerman didn't come from the night of the incident. Before we start deciding this thing based on Facebook posts, maybe we should look at court appearances.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics