Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Why are conservatives creepy? OH legislature votes to require genital inspections for kids’ sports "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] [b]This issue has shown some interesting fissures between the progressive and more moderate wings of the American left.[/b] Girls’ and women’s sports exist for the purpose of giving biological females a meaningful opportunity to compete. Allowing people who were born biologically male to compete in women’s sports will inevitably result in fewer opportunities for women to play and compete. [/quote] That’s what you guys designed it to do and that’s what you relentlessly hammer. You want divisions, you want anger and chaos. Meanwhile, [b]Ohio Republicans have mandated the rape of minor girls[/b]. How effed up can you guys be? Do you know how obvious your pedophilia has become in the last few years, or do you still think you’re hiding it well? [/quote] Don’t expect anyone to take you seriously when you say ridiculous unfounded crap like this. [/quote] Well, it's essentially true. Maybe you would prefer the term "forced digital inspection." [/quote] Nope. Still wrong. [/quote] Republican: I'm sure you're not a big reader, but if you can manage it, [b]READ THE F**KING BILL[/b]: https://search-prod.lis.state.oh.us/solarapi/v1/general_assembly_134/bills/hb151/PH/02/hb151_02_PH?format=pdf If a participant's sex is disputed, the participant shall establish the participant's sex by presenting a signed physician's statement indicating the participant's sex based upon only the following: (1) The participant's[b] internal and external reproductive anatomy[/b]; Meanwhile, little kids (and other people) are being slaughtered by freaks with assault rifles, but [b]this[/b] is what Republicans focus on. :thumbup: [/quote] A signed physician statement should not involve FORCED DIGITAL RAPE. Why do you people keep pushing this?[/quote] [b][i]What do you think an internal exam made mandatory by the state is?[/i] [/b] Misprision of rape isn’t a legal thing, I don’t think, but every person who continues to support the GOP is guilty of it. [/quote] Nowhere, NOWHERE, does it say that an internal exam will be made mandatory by the state. It says a physician note based on internal and external anatomy. Because, if you understand science, more than 99% of the time, a person with a vagina will have a uterus and ovaries. That will be more than enough for a physician to write a note identifying the persons sex. Do you think that every baby born with a vagina has a FORCED DIGITAL EXAM to confirm they are female? Seriously? That’s not how it works. Please, if you can highlight the passage that says FORCED INTERNAL EXAMS WILL BE MANDATED BY THE STATE, I would love to see it. [/quote] JFC you are working overtime not to grasp what the law said. A pp put it right there for you. You know why it’s bothering you so much? Because there’s a glimmer of a not brain dead maga in there who understands that maybe you shouldn’t be demanding to look into a little girl’s underpants, let alone inside her body. [/quote] Show me where it said forced internal exams. Please. Otherwise quit responding with ridiculous nonsense. [/quote] “The participant's internal and external reproductive anatomy.” Do you really, oh sainted and patient one who trucks not at all with “ridiculous nonsense” think that the party that shoved ultrasound wands up the vaginas of grown women - because you said you couldn’t trust them to tell the truth - would hesitate to force an internal exam? They’ll just take it on faith? The only ridiculous nonsense on this page is the stupidity of the average GOP voter. [/quote] So you still can’t show me where it mandates forced internal exams. I’ll keep waiting in case you find it. [/quote] La La La! No matter what evidence you present i just won't see it![/quote] Literally zero evidence has been presented. You STILL can’t highlight where the bill mandates forced internal exams. [/quote] HFS. Just admit that you have some issues that need to be worked out. Leave the grown ups to debate this since you’re having some tedious la la la I can’t see what you mean childish tantrum. [/quote] Yep. Grown ups understand that a digital exam is not the only way to verify internal sex organs. That is why we are discussing that the bill says absolutely nothing about forced digital exams. So yes, please let the grown ups continue to discuss. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics