Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Expectant and Postpartum Moms
Reply to "So what exactly is the problem with C-Sections?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I feel like it’s important to differentiate unassisted vaginal delivery from forceps/vacuum delivery. Does anyone know how instance of prolapse differs there? I feel like this is similar to the scheduled c vs c section after labor difference in outcomes. FWIW my birth classes didn’t spend much time on pelvic floor injuries but it was clear about the pros and cons of lots of interventions and I came away thinking c sections were WAY less scary than forceps. And this was a “natural birth” class too! [/quote] Anecdotally: I'm the one who mentioned her friend group and the friends with prolapse, and as I recall none of them had forceps or vacuum deliveries. My own mom had unassisted and unmedicated vaginal births and she developed serious prolapse issues in her 70s.[/quote] My mom had four babies vaginally, all pretty easy. Needed total reconstruction of her pelvic area/bladder in her 40s. [/quote] PP who asked: great to know, thank you both for the info![/quote] PP here with the friend group I referenced. FWIW, my anecdotal sense is that post-vaginal-birth prolapse is actually very common, but because the medical system and society in general does not care about the medical problems of older women, it is swept under the rug or just normalized. You see it here too: “oh, women who had c-section also get prolapse.” Well, yes, but not at the same rate, and there is also a question of severity. There is a strong desire to hide or minimize pelvic floor damage to women for deeply misogynist reasons IMO. Natural birth advocates are as guilty of this as the gerontologists who discount the suffering of older women. [/quote] Thanks for sharing! I agree with your misogyny premise tbh. While the “natural birth” thing worked out okay for me, I get twitchy at a lot of the rhetoric because it seems really dismissive of a lot of people’s experiences and preferences. :-/[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics