Reply to They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
Zero firsthand evidence. How is that a whistleblower???[/quote]

Good, so there's no need to out him or make his life miserable.

Good thing so many people are coming forward now to share their firsthand knowledge of Trump's abuse of office.[/quote]

So, there was no need for a "whistleblower" in the first place, if there was all of this firsthand knowledge.[/quote]

Good!  We agree!

whistleblower is not longer relevant. He did what he was supposed to do - report concerns.
He reported to the right place, as outlined above.

Glad you agree there's a lot of evidence now to deal with.[/quote]

Not sure we agree.  I said "in the first place"...you said "not longer relevant"....which means you think he was relevant at some point prior to now.   [/quote]

NP. He reported information that has been fully corroborated by the published testimonies of multiple people, as well as the published transcript of the 25 July call.

What's your issue? [/quote]

It wasn't fully corroborated.  For example, the WB complaint alleged that the Ukrainians knew the funds were withheld in early August.  Ambassador Taylor testified under oath that the Ukrainians did not know until August 29.[/quote]
Other evidence shows early August.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/23/us/politics/ukraine-aid-freeze-impeachment.html[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics