Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "They are exposing whistleblower. Drudge report"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Not sure we agree. I said "in the first place"...you said "not longer relevant"....which means you think he was relevant at some point prior to now. [/quote] Exactly. The whistleblower had concerns. He did what he was supposed to do. He reported his concerns to the correct authority. That was the point where the whistleblower was relevant. Now that the process has moved forward and there are multiple (eyewitness) testimonies, the whistleblower part of this process is no longer relevant. You are correct, thank you! [/quote] How can I be correct about something I did not say?[/quote] You are correct that the whistleblower was relevant at one point. Now that there is multiple eye witness testimony the whistleblower is no longer relevant.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
