Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Peter Strzok and Andy McCabe file wrongful termination lawsuits"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Enjoy prison Andy! I can’t think of a more deserving traitor![/quote] +1[/quote] He wasn't even indicted. He will win his wrongful termination lawsuit and recover his pension. +1 means?????[/quote] Bye Andy! See you in a couple years if you behave in the joint. I’ll post here when you lose your wrongful termination suit. Can’t W8. Maybe don’t lie next time?[/quote] [b]He. Was. Not. Indicted.[/b] No indictment means no trial, and no jail. Even the Grand Jury told the Trump administration to pound sand, you can’t fire people because they won’t be your stooges.[/quote] Not. Yet. The GJ just met last Thursday. Considering there are other investigations going on, (IG report, Durham's investigation), it is going to take more than one GJ session for them to decide.[/quote] I don't think you understand how this works.[/quote] I agree with pp. Maybe, just maybe, the GJ needs to hear from additional witnesses. [/quote] Again, this is not what happened. [/quote] Are you on the Grand Jury?????[/quote] It has been explained already. The GJ doesn't need to hear from additional witnesses, that is not how it works. If you have to ask this many times, then you simply don't understand. That is fine, but stop trying to hypothesize something that would be out of the ordinary in suggesting that McCabe is to be indicted. The DOJ, by its own guidelines, cannot go GJ shopping. If it starts doing that for McCabe, then we may as well ignore the guidelines about a sitting President not being indictable. Given Trump is Individual 1 in the Cohen case, SDNY could just go ahead and do it. Is that what you want?[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics