Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Advanced Academic Programs (AAP)
Reply to "WISC Scores"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I too was very concerned that my private psychologist did not report the GAI for my child (whose profile is very much high VCI/PRI and lower WMI/PSI). I talked to the psychologist and she assured me that Carol Horn (who is in charge of Fairfax GT) disfavors the GAI, and any competent person can calculate it in a matter of seconds (I did this myself using the technical report). The psychologist felt strongly that the appeals committee wants to see just the VCI, PRI, WSI, PSI, FSIQ and the subtest scores, and advised me NOT to muck up the report with the GAI. So that's what we're doing, even though the GAI would place my child in the 99th percentile (compared to 97% on FSIQ). [b]Also, I too am curious why Fairfax pushes GMU's grad student testers. Any one have any ideas on this?[/b] Thanks![/quote] yeah because they can't be bribed or bought. :roll: Your post is illustrative. What's the psychologist doing advising you on what the FCPS GT people want to see? Their job is supposed be to adminsiter the test and score the results. Period. Except obviously a cottage has industry had grown up around getting kids into the GT program. For money.[/quote] Nothing is wrong with those extra information if no result was altered or enhanced. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics