Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Prince Harry and Archie"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]So it specifically says here that HARRY is the one that regards Archie as a private citizen and HARRY doesn't want to have public ceremonies but we're blaming Meghan. Got it. [/quote] Oh puhlease. Harry was never private before Meghan. Be smarter PP.[/quote] DP. Harry is entitled/allowed to make different choices for his son than those made by Prince Charles for his sons. Harry is allowed to have a different view of things now that he has his own child. Did you ever see the footage of William and Harry walking in Diana's funeral procession? I have no doubt he would make that choice for his DS. I feel compelled to point out this misguided quote from the article: [i]“Many people don’t understand why they are paying nearly £3m for Harry and Meghan’s house, so in terms of public relations it would be a good quid pro quo for the pair to briefly show Archie off.”[/i] I'm not even British and I understand that the $$ being used to renovate Frogmore Cottage does not come directly from British taxpayers. It's from the Sovereign Grant which is a percentage of the annual profits of the "Crown Estate" (properties own by the 'crown' and not the government or any individual monarch) which s intended to meet the costs of the sovereign's official expenditures. This includes the costs of the upkeep of the various royal residences, staffing, travel and state visits, public engagements, and official entertainment (thank you wikipedia). This means that the queen gets to decide what to do with the money she gets from the 'crown' properties. These aren't taxpayer funds, these are the queen's funds and when the next king takes the throne, they'll be his funds. And, the renovations don't include furnishings (like curtains, beds, etc.) or upgrades to the kitchen, closets, floors, etc. Harry and Meghan have to pay for those personally. But, people thrive on alt-facts/misinformation and feel good when they get yet another opportunity to bash/blame Meghan. https://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/11/21/but-the-queen-is-paying-for-the-370-million-buckingham-palace-repairs-already/#7443f0b13214[/quote] How much of British history do you know? What you are essentially referring to is the Duchy of Lancaster. That, and many others, are the Queen's income. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_of_Lancaster The Crown properties and Crown Estate are very different. How do you think they got all of these properties? Back in the day, when you were King, in the glorious days of absolute Monarchy, you were entitled to take whatever you wanted because you were King, sent by God. Then, some other wannabe King would kill you and take everything you owned, and annex more, maybe lose France or Denmark, etc. At some point, around 1688, Britain transitioned to a Constitutional Monarchy and had to begin to work some of this out. It has been a process. But guess what, they do not just get to own everything. They have more investments than any family would ever need, along with many of their old landed friends. Check out Grosvenor, one of the largest global real estate firms with massive holdings. Check out who owns them. These families are still raking in profits like its medieval times. The people of England are entitled to their opinion on the monies from the Crown Estate...because the money comes out of their pockets as payments to the Crown via rents on farms, factories, many aspects of the British economy. Meghan would be wise to pay *a little more* attention. It's kind of like the most extreme form of white privilege, and there is a deal worked out around it. You get to keep these, but in the return you do x and y. They are not supposed to rub people's nose in their spending, for one, and the non-stop Givenchy does her no favors. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics