Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "LMVSC TD"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Dumbasses. You don’t have to worship at the Altar of Pepe to see and be affected by the chaotic management of LMVSC.[/quote] What specific chaos has affected your team/player? It just seems people here want to sling wild accusations with little substance. [/quote] Oh, ok, I owe you an explanation or I’m a “Pepette?” Yeah, sure. Did you go to the meetings, where Lula talked about how they’re going to *change everything*? Caring about the blue teams as anything more than cash would be a good start.[/quote] I think that's a real issue that's been at the club. My question is do you think that was a directive of Lula's, to not focus on the blue and white teams? Or was that on Este to establish the culture as the td? It seems like people want to blame Lula for everything and put none of the blame on the staff. Lula is coaching 2 white teams next year. Este has grabbed his friends, no matter the qualifications, and put them all on the top teams at SYC. To me, that speaks volumes as to where the issue came from.[/quote] Whoa, is this the same person who is quoted above? We've come a long way from "Pepetttes" and "wild accusations." Look, the treatment of blue and, to a lesser extent, white teams is either the result of chaotic management (i.e. not focused on a club-wide culture/philosophy) or calculated neglect. Neither is a good look. Whose responsibility it was doesn't really matter to me. And it really has nothing to do with Pepe, so why he came into this conversation I don't know. So the accusations aren't so wild. If you're in the know, could you offer some insight into the thinking behind the two "red" teams in some age groups? Because this doesn't sound like an idea based on solid soccer development, but rather on a desire to entire enrollment for certain groups of players tied to certain coaches while allowing both groups to feel special. While the rest of the kids in the age group get to follow the LMVSC directive for blue teams, i.e. gfy. [/quote] I am purely speculating here however in regards to your question of the “two” red teams. The way I read the coaching slate is that those 2 coaches are assigned to one team. I noticed that happened with any team assigned one of the “ directors”. You will notice syc did the same with any team assigned to Tupy or Pepe also the new age group directors. Per league regulations I am sure you can’t have 2 teams labeled as top teams. Email the dotc if you want to be certain. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics