Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "Why do some care about rules about gay people but ignore rule about shrimp, rape, and stoning women?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Yeah I'll take the actual bible over the pope any day. [/quote] Except the problem is, if you're Catholic, the Pope's word is supposed to be infallible, so you can't exactly dismiss what he has to say. [/quote] Papal infallibility is a Catholic construct that only kicks in he speaks [i]ex cathedra [/i]about matters of faith and doctrine. The doctrine of papal infallibility was "solemnly defined" via Vatican I on 18 July 1870. There has been one explicit [i]ex cathedra[/i] decree since then, when Pius XII defined the Assumption of Mary as an article of faith in 1950. Before the solemn definition of 1870, there were a limited number of [i]ex cathedra[/i] decrees, such as the bull Unam Sanctam of 1302 (Boniface VIII) and the papal constitution Ineffabilis Deus of 1854 (Pius IX). Tldr; not everything the pope says is taken to be infallible as Catholics. That only happens in extraordinary and specific circumstances.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
