Reply to Candace Owens Twitter account suspended for racist tweets, hahahaha!

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Candace Owens Twitter account suspended for racist tweets, hahahaha!"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous][quote=jsteele][quote=Anonymous]Guess what I just learned? Laura Ingraham, the Republican news anchor, Jeff just held up as a bigot, adopted a child from Guatemala! She welcomed a brown child into her own family. Isn't that wonderful?[/quote]

Wow, according to her own words, she is complicit in destroying America.  I guess that shows how much of her spiel is simply an act to fool the rubes.

[/quote]
How do you know what she means by massive demographic changes? Maybe she means the effort to import millions and millions of poor, uneducated people and it has nothing to do with race. (Remember, the illegal immigrants forcing their way into this country average a 10th grade education.)[/quote]

Oh, now who is defending racists? Double standard, double standard. If she said white people were destroying America, you would be outraged.

Immigrants to the US have always been poor and uneducated. That has been the complaint about every single large group of immigrants. It was said about the Irish and about the Italians. Even Trump's own grandfather was a poor uneducated immigrant. 
[/quote]
Except she never said brown people were destroying America. She never specified a race at all. All she said was changing demographics. You sure are quick to jump on supposed racism against brown people, which again she never said, and continue to defend blatant anti-white racism. Unreal.

And there has got to be a limit as to how many poor, high school dropouts the country can afford to absorb. That's not racism. That's just pure economics. If you import millions and millions of people who do not pay income taxes, and thus an ever-shrinking percentage at the top has to pay an ever-increasing share, until it all collapses. As it is, half the country is not contributing to the federal government. Should we just keep allowing more and more low-income, uneducated immigrants unable to provide for their families so that it will be 60%? 70%?

Nothing to do with race. The fact is that other developed countries don't throw open their doors to every single poor person with no skills or education, and no demonstrated way to support himself. Even during the Great Immigration, right here, people entering had to show that they would not become a public charge.[/quote]

This is a perfect example of whitesplaining. Oh, it's not about race. It's about poor and uneducated folks. Those poor and uneducated just happen to be brown, but nobody ever said brown. One poster mentioned a failure to speak English, so we are really talking about poor, uneducated, non-English speakers, but nobody said brown. As if you would oppose poor, uneducated, non-English speaking Norwegians.

Once again, Ingraham explicitly included legal immigrants among those who are destroying America. What evidence do you have that legal immigrants are overly uneducated and poor? When Ingraham complains about the demographics of legal immigrants, she is talking about skin color and religion. You know that and I know that. You are perfectly comfortable with that sort of bigotry. But, nobody better mock Ingraham, that would be racist.
[/quote]
You're the only one here assuming poor and uneducated means brown. Why would you make such a racist leap? Haven't you ever worked with Indians, with their advanced degrees? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics