Reply to Kim Cattrall SJP feud

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Kim Cattrall SJP feud"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

SJP had been leaking rumors about Kim holding up the movies for more pay over the years. I guess it is over due for a public smack down.[/quote]

[b]She is on the record as supporting Kim Cattrall asking for more money and saying Kim should not be vilified for it. [/b]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/starsandstories/3673501/Sex-and-the-City-The-Movie-exclusive-on-set-report.html[/quote]

After people realized the manipulative stuff she was pulling to try to force Kim in to another train wreck of a movie. More importantly, Kim says she didn't ask for more money. Kim said there weren't even conversations. See what SJP did?[/quote]

And yet other people besides SJP, including Willie Garson (who played Stanford), came out at the time and said that Kim Cattrall spent six months negotiating a contract for SATC 3 and then quit because she wasn't getting the terms she wanted. That's her prerogative, but don't lie and say you were never interested and there were never conversations when you were having conversations for six months, during which time other cast and crew members put other projects and paychecks on hold because they thought you were sincere about wanting to do a third movie. It's deeply disrespectful to everyone involved. SJP was and will be fine, but for others, that was a big hit, professionally and financially, that Kim Cattrall refuses to even acknowledge.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics