Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Kim Cattrall SJP feud"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] SJP had been leaking rumors about Kim holding up the movies for more pay over the years. I guess it is over due for a public smack down.[/quote] [b]She is on the record as supporting Kim Cattrall asking for more money and saying Kim should not be vilified for it. [/b] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film/starsandstories/3673501/Sex-and-the-City-The-Movie-exclusive-on-set-report.html[/quote] After people realized the manipulative stuff she was pulling to try to force Kim in to another train wreck of a movie. More importantly, Kim says she didn't ask for more money. Kim said there weren't even conversations. See what SJP did?[/quote] The linked article (from 2008) is about the first movie, not the third. Cattrall demanded more money to do that movie, resulting in her earning $6 million for the film while Nixon and Davis earned only $2 million each. You really think the producers decided to offer Cattrall three times as much money as Davis and Nixon out of the goodness of their hearts? Of course not, it was because Cattrall wouldn’t sign on without a bigger paycheck. Good for her, women should be negotiating bigger paychecks to reflect their worth, but let’s not pretend it didn’t happen in order to vilify someone else.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics