Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Blake Lively- Jason Baldoni and NYT - False Light claims "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]There is no way Jed is going to survive discovery. They're going to tear into his previous clients and astroturfing. Maybe he's looking for a quick settlement.[/quote] Why would that be relevant? Wouldn’t they be able to figure out what he did or didn’t do re: Blake?[/quote] Because they can say he has history of astroturfing, therefore get access to his messages/documents with past clients to lay out that history. That stuff wouldn't be protect. Just like the discovery will extend to Blake's famous friends and her companies, it will extend to Jed's clients. Discovery will be brutal. [/quote] Astroturfing other people isn’t relevant to the claims here. Jed would fight discovery requests here and I’d be surprised if a judge allows it.[/quote] His history of astroturfing is completely relevant. Her defense is that he was hired and help create bots for Justin. Have you guys ever been in a discovery. They aren't always directly relevant to the claims. That's why it's always said discoveries are a killer. [/quote] fishing expedition. What do his past clients have to do with Baldoni? Nothing admissible there. They can ask what he did for Baldoni, the terms of engagement with Baldoni, etc. [/quote] You don't think his past tactics are going to come up?? Seriously? Its not a fishing expedition in the slightest. Discoveries are extremely extensive for a reason. They don't and aren't going to focus on just Baldoni. That goes for Baldoni discoveries against Blake as well. Thinking otherwise is naive. [/quote] “Discoveries are clearly extensive for a reason.” Yes, you are clearly an expert on discoveries. The rest of us are actual litigators.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics