Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "College Football--Big Ten Expansion"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Would NC State & UNC have a way out of the ACC without penalty due to illegality if Stanford & Cal were admitted as ACC members without the votes of UNC & NC State and Cal & Stanford insisted on using transgender athletes in women's sports ?[/quote] Don't need their votes if they get Clemson. And it would be legal because when the ACC that was the rule that they agreed to. Can't get out of it later. On the transgeder --- not sure that is or was a serious question. I doubt that is the direction they are going.[/quote] I think that you misunderstand my posts--sorry if I wasn't clear enough. If UNC & NC State voted to add Stanford, then they probably wouldn't have an out based on illegality--that is why I specified that the ACC expansion was without the votes of UNC & NC State. Four ACC teams/schools are based in North Carolina (Duke, Wake Forest, UNC, NC State). If Stanford or Cal tried to use a transgender athlete in a women's sport, it would be illegal in the state of North Carolina.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics