Reply to APS: Think the "no move" campaign is going to work?

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "APS: Think the "no move" campaign is going to work?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I think I understand the argument now.  If they say it’s not a boundary decision, they don’t need to account for the cost.  This may present a legitimate problem for the school board if the decision gets challenged and we’ll have to go through this whole process over again.   I think calling it not a boundary decision is incorrect, but I had assumed it was a trivial technicality because it looked as if the school board had jumped through the same procedural and data hoops as would be required for a boundary decision.  But maybe not?[/quote]

By this logic, doing nothing is also a "boundary decision" because the imminent opening of Reed and the capacity shortage in the east would require redrawing boundaries too![/quote]

It’s my post you’re responding to.  Just to be clear, I take no position on the merits.  Presumably the school board has staff lawyers who evaluate compliance with rules etc.  I leave it to them to figure it all out.  [/quote]

Lol you would presume. There are no staff lawyers. If there were the former Superintendent wouldn’t have tried “his” swap. Instead they just wasted taxpayer money and time for a couple of years. I think no matter what side you’re on in regards to the move, there is some deeply troubling incompetence in the system.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics