Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Soccer
Reply to "ECNL forcing Brave & Union Partnership"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]These clubs were notified in November / December timeframe. Don’t get fooled, people. Union also tried to merge with several other clubs and then settled on Brave because VDA and NVA weren’t having it. Brave and Union did not have to merge together, they just both got put into the same boat.[/quote] Every pro sports league has a trade deadline and offseason periods where administrative things can and can't happen. ECNL has timelines too for tryouts - March 1 - and other things. For the purpose of caring about the kids that you pretend to care about, suggestion is that nothing like this should be allowed to happen for 45 days before tryout windows open. If its true that McLean was notified in November, then they should have had time to work it out. Get it done by 1/15 or risk being kicked out by ECNL. If ECNL is going to kick you out, that should happen by 1/15 also. If new clubs are joining ECNL or GA or whatever - all that needs to be done by 1/15. [/quote] Sounds like someone is trying to go into damage control. Who is trying to save face? ECNL or the clubs? Sad part is, nobody will do what's right and let the public know how it played out. Why? Because the truth will cause some ripple of negative PR for them, whether it's the league or the club however you shake it.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics