Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wow it's almost like letting judges create laws without push back means they could also toss away those same laws. Who could have foreseen such a obvious turn of events aside from anyone with any hint of pattern recognition whatsoever. If decide to let judges legislate from the bench, they will inevitably do so in a way that you don't agree with.[/quote] Roe didn’t legislate any rights away. Nice try.[/quote] Did you even read what you quoted? Here, let me bold the relevant section for you. [b]letting judges create laws without push back means they could also toss away those same laws.[/b] [/quote] Yes I did. And I don’t believe Roe created any law. It preserved the rights of women to access healthcare with limitations pursuant to the interest of the state. In my opinion, the state interest cited in Roe was BS. But they didn’t legislate from the bench. [/quote] There was no 'right' to abortion before the justices created it. Yes, they were legislating from the bench. Yes, they're doing it again right now. You're upset because they're legislating from the bench in a way you don't agree with, but you shouldn't hide behind that emotion with lies. [/quote] Wrong. reproductive freedom is fundamental. Show me any coherent argument suggesting that the constitution wasn’t meant to protect that freedom. We have the right to life and liberty, and restricting healthcare infringes upon those rights. Must meet strict scrutiny. This court tries to take the easy way out of that test by just erasing rights. It’s stunningly evil.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics