Reply to DCPS students shafted again - sign petition to keep Jelleff field public

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "DCPS students shafted again - sign petition to keep Jelleff field public"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

"The term of this Agreement (the “Term”) shall commence on the date hereof (the“Commencement Date”) and expire on June 29, 2020 (the “Expiration Date”)."

[/quote]

Oh snap. But by all means, PP above, don't let facts and actual contract language inconveniently derail your fictional spin act. [/quote]

Where is the link to the contract? I don't have the time that you apparently do.

"Oh snap"? lol.. I hope there was a neck swivel too... [/quote]

Has been posted multiple times in this thread.  This is not the full, final agreement- it's the initial MOA, but the term language is the same- page 4 of 17.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ycNlJMWbHeYHXEp05bI--O3JMLhAflAT/view[/quote]

And the easement (which is the recorded document that controls) can be found on the Recorder of Deeds site.

https://otr.cfo.dc.gov/service/recorder-deeds-document-images

Document # 2010001187
Can also search by square and lot: square 1299, lot 0041

That's where the extension language is listed.

Not an attorney, but do work with them a good amount on these types of agreements.  I am pretty sure an extension under a new set of terms would be functionally considered a new contract, and thus fall under the purview of DC laws in effect as of August 2019 when the extension was executed.  So the various contracting rules enacted in 2014 would apply.  But again, not a lawyer, not a full contracts or DC law expert.  It will be up to OAG and possibly DC Superior Court to determine that if the Council challenges the validity of the extension contract.  Would very much like to see the OAG or MOLC (Mayor's Office of Legal Counsel) legal review memo that should have been drafted before this extension was executed, and if it speaks to this point.  It will likely be a (the?) major point of discussion as to the validity of the District's signature on the extension- if they didn't go through the proper procedures in sourcing and approving the contract/extension, then they didn't have the legal authority to execute it on the District's behalf, and it is void.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics