Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "College Football--Big Ten Expansion"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] Stanford would have to take a 25 percent payout forever then the big ten might take them but probably wouldn’t because a malcontent member is poison.[/quote] Big ten doesn’t need Stanford. Stanford has very limited leverage right now[/quote] Depends upon how the Big Ten Conference feels about locking up the West Coast & about the tremendous benefits to be derived from cooperation regarding research & academics.[/quote] I still think that the B1G will offer both schools. If you don’t see any movement soon, I expect this will be the reason why. [/quote] How being in the same athletic conference translates into research cooperation is wishful thinking at best. At the end of day revenue / $$ will be the primary deciding factor[/quote] You don’t understand the Big Ten and how its leaders think. If they would have to do it over again, Nebraska would not be admitted because it’s not an AAU school and its academic ranking is very low in comparison to the rest of the conference. [/quote] Fox/BIG just raided the PAC and walked over the corpses of Cal and Stanford to do it. Two schools ranked higher than every school in the BIG. What don't we understand? [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics