Reply to Bad Art Friend

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Bad Art Friend"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Larson was wrong to rip off Darmond’s letter, but at this point Darmond is a clueless attention seeker trying to destroy Larson’s career. SHE requested the subpoena for the mean texts. She pitched the story to the NYT! All because Larson and her community didn’t properly acknowledge her navel-gazing Facebook posts about her kidney donation. I don’t have sympathy for Larson, she dug her own grave, but Darmond is a nut case. I’m shocked she passed the psychological test to donate an organ, honestly.[/quote]

That Darmond is a nut case is not in doubt.  She seems, however to have some kind of a moral compass.

Whether or not Larson and her friends do is debatable.[/quote]

How is Dawn the “nut case”? She seems earnest and awkward, but also vulnerable and sincere. She wasn’t a cool kid and was mocked relentlessly for it - well before discovering her “friend” lifted very personal Facebook posts for literary inspiration, publishing some verbatim.

Dawn reacted as I believe many of us would - she was hurt, angry, and sought some sort of acknowledgement - first from Larson and then from publishers, etc - that she’d been wronged.

I feel for Dawn and find the continually description of her as a “nut” or “crazy” so misogynistic and loaded with the same toxicity that led to her being bullied to begin with. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics