Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Van Lifer couple camping in Utah national park - two weeks later fiancee arrives in FL alone"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I am still not convinced he returned home September 1. He could be anywhere. It is like the DC sniper situation where we were told the sniper is in a white van and all the what to look for details to public were wrong.[/quote] There is a viral Tiktok from a woman who said she picked BL up as a hitch hiker near Jackson Hole on August 29th around 6pm. And he (obviously) didn't have the van when he was hitch hiking. It's 36 hours to drive from Jackson WY to North Port FL straight through, so he'd have to have left pretty darn soon after the hitch hiking encounter (and driven without many breaks) to have made it back to FL on the 1st of September. [/quote] Whoa. So it sounds like someone else drove it back? Yikes! [/quote] The released search warrant says the van was caught on a license plate reader entering North Port FL around 10:30am September 1st. At this point all released information strongly insinuates that BL was the one driving it, and I think that’s by far the most likely scenario. If he was not, investigators already know. The FBI would know if someone in his family flew somewhere during that time, and even if they drove they could have substantiated that by now. They probably wouldn’t release that, but also the search activity around this so far doesn’t really point in that direction. Besides the fact the simplest explanation is just that he drove it. I see 4 possible explanations for the tiktok: 1. Is off by a day 2. He really did drive with only a few sleep breaks, possibly using stimulants 3. They picked up another hitchhiker and it’s a false sighting 4. Lying for clout. I do think there’s a chance the story checks out. They released the story before the last location really became known, and the locations aren’t far off and sort of make sense. It initially seemed like based on other stuff (talking about Yellowstone) they would have likely been farther north. It seems plausible. But they don’t really have any hard evidence. Let’s say they did give him a ride at 6 pm on the 29th. If he got in the van and left shortly after that, that leaves about 64 hours to 10:30am on Sept 1. He could have taken a few breaks for sleeping and he certainly would have been motivated to get as far away as fast as he could. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics